|
Search our Site
ON THIS PAGE:
Admission to Doctoral Program
Preliminary Research Presentation and Exam
|
Doctor of Philosophy Official Degree
Requirements May 14, 2007 Note: Old course numbers are listed in parentheses. This document lists the combined requirements of the Graduate School and of the Department of Computer Science (COMP) and supersedes all previous issues. Reference is occasionally made for further details to the Graduate School Handbook (GSH). Apparent errors in the present document should be called to the attention of the Director of Graduate Studies.
Admission to Doctoral Program Financial support from the department will normally not be provided beyond the fourth semester for students who have not been admitted to the doctoral program.
Advising
Administration A full-time Student Services Manager maintains student records, answers student queries, and directs student requests to the Graduate Studies Committee and to the Graduate School. All student requests should be made through the Student Services Manager, usually on forms obtainable online or from the Manager.
Course Requirements Primary concentration. Three or four courses of which at least two support in depth the specific dissertation topic and at least one supports more generally the area of computer science in which the dissertation topic falls. The courses do not need to be related to each other, except in that they support the dissertation. These courses may have been taken as an undergraduate and may have been counted towards an undergraduate degree. Breadth requirement. Each student must take an additional 6 courses to fulfill a breadth requirement. Courses are classified into the following 4 categories. The set of six breadth courses must meet the following criteria.
The student's mastery of content will be determined by the course grade in the six courses satisfying the breadth requirement: a P- or better must be obtained in each course, and a Calingaert score of 0 or higher must be obtained on the six courses combined. The Calingaert Score is a weighted average of course grades, where the weights are chosen so that a score of 0 reflects an average letter grade between a P+ and an H-. The weights for the letter grades are as follows:
For example, the Calingaert Score for three courses with letter grades P+, H-, and H would be (-1 + 1 + 3)/3 = +1.0 (assuming the three courses carry the same number of credit hours). The name recognizes Dr. Peter Calingaert, professor emeritus, who devised the measure when he was Director of Graduate Studies. Background Preparation. In addition, each student must demonstrate mastery of the subjects considered to be essential or required preparation for our graduate program. The following UNC-Chapel Hill (UNC-CH) courses define the required preparation for our program (for a more detailed description of the course contents, consult the UNC-CH course catalog).
Computer Science
Mathematics, Statistics, and Physics
Typically most of this material will have been part of the student's undergraduate education, but it is entirely normal to include one or more courses in the Ph.D. Program of Study to satisfy this requirement. Each student must detail their Background Preparation (Form CS-1) showing when and where the material above was mastered (note that a course is not required; industrial experience, for example, is a valid way to fulfill this requirement). In case of uncertainty about the material required, consult the instructor of the course or the instructor(s) of courses that include the material as a prerequisite. The program adviser and the Graduate Studies Committee review background preparation. Minor. The election of a formal minor is optional and infrequent. If a minor is elected, it must include at least 15 hours of courses that are taught by departments other than COMP (and are not merely cross-listings of COMP courses). The minor must also meet all the requirements described in GSH 19. Relevant graduate courses from other accredited institutions or from other graduate programs at UNC-CH can be transferred to satisfy any of the foregoing course requirements (GSH 19). Course transfers must be approved by the Graduate Studies Committee and by the Graduate School. The Graduate School may require the student to pass an examination on the course content before approving the transfer. Courses taken at Duke University, N.C. Central University, N.C. State University, UNC-Charlotte, and UNC-Greensboro count as home courses requiring no formal transfer (GSH 6).
Program Product
Requirement
The project options must be approved by two faculty members. The student must file Form CS-13 to document completion of the requirement.
Preliminary Research Presentation
and Exam Another way to demonstrate research ability is to participate in research leading to a publication. Students who have been major contributors to a UNC paper submitted to a well-known, refereed conference, and have given a publicly announced talk at the department, may apply for a waiver of the exam. Presentation and Exam. During the first or second semester of graduate study, a PhD intending student must begin to engage in research under the supervision of a Computer Science faculty member. Time may be set aside for this by registering for three hours of COMP 991 with the advisor each semester. Note that this is also recommended for MS intending students who are not working on a research project as research assistants. At the beginning of each semester, the Examination Committee will publish deadlines for registration and administration of this exam. Registration. The Examination Committee solicits student registrations for each offering of the admissions exam. A student interested in admission to the Doctoral program can register for the exam, or apply for deferral of the exam (on form CS-14), or elect to forfeit the offering. Permission to defer the exam is generally only granted in case of extensive need for remediation courses, substantial language difficulties, or other extenuating circumstances. For each student, the Examination Committee will appoint an examining committee consisting of three faculty members, not including the advisor of the research. Examiners will be chosen taking into account suggestions from the research advisor and a project abstract submitted by the student, as well as faculty workload. Administration. By the deadline specified by the Examination Committee, each student must submit a written project report (similar in style and length to a conference publication) to the three members of his or her exam committee and schedule a time for a presentation. The presentation will be public, and must be attended by the three examiners. Following the talk and public questions, the examiners will ask questions in a private session, which the research advisor may attend. The intent is for the examiners to probe for evidence of research creativity, formal thinking, and rigor. Note that the project report may optionally be used to satisfy the M.S. Technical Writing Requirement. If the student wishes to exercise this option, he or she should ask the advisor and one of the exam committee members to serve as the designated readers, and to read the paper with this goal in mind. The student should file Form CS-8 with the Student Services Manager. Scope. The scope of the questions will be determined by the student's exam committee, which may engage in a dialog with the student and request an outline of the project report. Questions will most likely be not only on the presented research, but also on background and related material. Decision. At a faculty meeting near the end of the semester, the case of each student who took the exam will be discussed. At that time, the faculty will vote on admission to the PhD. If a student is not admitted, a second vote will be taken to establish whether the student passed the exam. Optionally the faculty may direct or advise the student to make another presentation, and also advise whether a second attempt at the exam is warranted. Second attempt. Students who do not pass the first exam, may make a second attempt. For a second exam (or one that is attempted beyond the third semester without an authorized deferral), the Examination Committee will appoint two groups of three faculty members each (again not including the research advisor). The Examination Committee will attempt to include examiners from the first attempt. The two exam committees will each schedule a one-hour exam with the candidate. The scope of the examinations are set for each student by the Examinations Committee on the basis of the student's selection of four courses that define the topic areas of the exam, in addition to the student's presented research. Normally these are courses taken in the program to date, and must include one course in the area of Theory and Formal Thinking. Final approval of the submitted list rests with the Examination Committee. The student may decide to schedule another presentation, or may be directed to do so by the faculty. This should be at a time when all of the six examiners are available, and before the two exams are scheduled. Before the end of the fourth semester the faculty will again consider admission to the Doctoral Program. Waiver of the exam. A student who is a major contributor to a paper prepared in collaboration with a UNC Computer Science faculty member, and that has been submitted to a well-known, refereed conference or journal, may apply for a waiver of the admissions exam. The waiver must be approved by a vote of the faculty (normally if the waiver is granted, the faculty will also discuss an early admission to the Doctoral Program). The student must have given an announced, public presentation before the vote on the waiver, and the admissions decision is based on all of the other factors listed above, including grades and testimony from the faculty. The application for a waiver must be submitted to the Examination Committee by the examination registration deadline. Exam Timeline. This is meant as a guide to the Examination Committee to use in order to set specific deadlines each semester, taking into account holidays, etc.
Doctoral Written Examination
Doctoral Oral Examination The examination, normally two to three hours in length, will be administered by the student's doctoral committee. The scope of the examination will be selected by the committee, which will inform the student in writing of its selection well in advance. The scope will be limited to testing areas of weakness identified on the Doctoral Written Examination, preparation for research, and subjects judged by the committee to be relevant to the area of the student's dissertation. If, after passing the Doctoral Oral examination, the student undertakes dissertation research in a different area, the doctoral committee appointed for the new dissertation may require the student to take a further Doctoral Oral examination on the new area. If failed, the examination may be retaken, once only (except by petition), after a lapse of at least three months (GSH 21).
Dissertation A cooperative meeting of the student with his or her doctoral committee will be held to discuss the feasibility of the student's proposed research. At least one week before meeting, the student shall submit to the committee a brief written dissertation proposal defining the scope of the proposed research and the planned method of attack on the research problem. The committee will either approve or reject the plan at this meeting. The student is responsible for arranging the time and place of the meeting. The meeting can either precede or follow the Doctoral Oral examination, by either a short or a long interval, at the discretion of the student and committee. The student is expected to call a committee meeting at least every six months to discuss the progress of the dissertation, and to submit a one-page summary of progress each semester to the Director of Graduate Studies. The student's doctoral committee consists of at least five persons, a majority of whom must be regular members of the COMP Graduate Faculty. Other committee members may be faculty from other institutions, scholars from industry, or others whose expertise is relevant to the dissertation (GSH 21). At least one committee member must hold the rank of Associate Professor or higher. The student names the committee by submitting the "Recommendation for Composition of Doctoral Dissertation Committee" form. For each proposed committee member who is not on the Graduate Faculty, a curriculum vitae and the Graduate School form "Recommendation for Appointment to Membership on the Graduate Faculty" should be attached. The dissertation adviser serves as committee chair, unless the adviser is not a COMP faculty member, in which event a COMP faculty member serves as chair. The student must register for at least six credit hours of dissertation, COMP 994 (394) (GSH 21).
Final Oral Examination
Other Requirements Each student is normally required to have one semester of classroom teaching experience including planning, teaching and grading, here or elsewhere. Enrollment in COMP 915 (321) must be completed before the requirement can be met. This requirement is often satisfied by teaching an undergraduate course in one semester or summer session, and sometimes by teaching half of a three-credit graduate course. The Graduate Studies Committee may approve other ways of satisfying the requirement. The student should document fulfillment of the requirement by filing Form CS-11. Each student is strongly urged, but not required, to spend at least one summer in employment as a professional computer scientist. A doctoral written examination, a doctoral oral examination, and a final oral examination covering the dissertation and other topics as required by the examining committee must be passed. Students must be registered the semester(s) in which exams are taken. Students must be registered for 394 (minimum of three credit hours) in the semester in which the dissertation is defended (GSH 21). All requirements for the Ph.D. must be completed within eight calendar years from the date of the student's first classification as a doctoral student by the Graduate School. If a student is admitted directly to doctoral study, as indicated in the letter offering admission, the eight years begin upon first registration. If a student is permitted by faculty vote to bypass the M.S. degree, or to continue beyond the M.S. degree, the eight years begin at the start of the regular term or summer session that immediately follows the faculty vote or that in which the M.S. is conferred. Although the Department tries to keep track of degree time limits, the Graduate School's interpretation is controlling, and students are responsible for meeting the time limits. As much as two years of time spent in active military service, the Peace Corps, or VISTA will not be counted against the time limit, provided that the Graduate School is informed. Also, a student may request a leave of absence for a definite, stated time, not to exceed one year. If the Department and Graduate School approve, the duration of the leave is not counted against the time limit (GSH 23). If degree requirements change during a student's stay in the Department, the student has the option of continuing under the old rules or switching and satisfying all the new rules. In other words, the student can elect any point in time during his or her stay in the Department and satisfy all the rules in effect at that point. An exception to any rule may be requested for cause by petition. Decisions made by individual faculty members or by committees may be appealed to the Department faculty as a whole.
Summary and Required Forms By the end of semester 5
By the end of semester 6
By the end of semester 7
By the end of semester 8
At any time
By the end of semester 10
Just before you leave . . .
|
![]()
| Department of Computer Science Campus Box 3175, Sitterson Hall College of Arts & Sciences The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175 USA Phone: (919) 962-1700 Fax: (919) 962-1799 |
Content
Manager: Director of
Graduate Studies Server Manager: webmaster@cs.unc.edu Last Content Review: 17 September 2006 |