id      MPres MPape  FRel FDsgn FImpl FTalk FDemo ClsPa TOTAL rank grade
     ----------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- -----
     -----68423     90    95    90    30    20   100   100    30    61   8  H
     -----75241     85    85    90    60    50    70   100    80    73   3  H
     -----77102     85    87    90    70    60    85     0    50    66   4  H
     -----16980     80    87    90    70    60    85     0    60    66   4  H
     -----30582     60    80    90    80    70    85     0     0    62   7  H
     -----26025     95    95    90    70    70    95   100    50    81   1  H+
     -----58426     85    95    90    40    30    70     0    10    49   9  H-
     -----98337     90    85    90   100     0   100     0    60    63   6  H
     -----75493     85    80    90    70    70    95   100    70    80   2  H+

MPres: Midterm Presentation
MPape: Midterm Paper
FRel:  Final survey of Related Work
FDsgn: Final Design
FImpl: Final Implementation
FTalk: Final Talk
FDemo: Final Demo
ClsPa: Class Participation

Weightage:
10 (MPres) 10(MPaper) 10(FRel)	40(FDsgn FImpl) 10(FTalk) 10(FDemo) 10(ClsPart)
Cutoffs: H+ 80 H 60 H- 40

The scores indicate opportunities for improvement.  Given so many dimensions,
I looked for strengths  rather than weaknesses when deciding on the grades.
In particular, I did not let circumstances beyond your control have an
adverse affect on your grade.