![]() |
INLS 357: Interactivity Experience | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Brief description of the interaction: Last week I was voluntarily bumped from my return trip from Frankfurt, Germany to RDU. My interaction was between the airline staff and me. A person volunteering to be bumped still goes through the process as if taking the flight. Only in the last minute when airline knows it is overbooked, do you get bumped, which means retrieving your luggage, being reimbursed, and waiting for the next day to catch the next flight, which in my case was the next day. 1. In what "language(s)" did the interaction proceed?
The flow of interaction was as follows:
2. What was the total time for the interaction?
3. Who/what initiated the interaction?
4. Who/what ended the interaction?
5. How many cycles did the interaction entail (how many turns were
taken)?
6. Estimate a proportion of time allocation for yourself and the
interacting person/object.
Airline: I can only measure the direct interaction with me. I was asked questions 4 times for a total of 10 minutes. I have no estimate for the additional time the airline spent to process paperwork for bumping me. Airport: Judging by the time I had to wait for my luggage, the
Airport was busy for 45 minutes to find and deliver it.
7. Were there any misunderstandings? If so, how were they repaired?
8. Rate the level of control you felt YOU had during the interaction I had full control I had most control Equal
Control I had little control
I had no control
I had full control because I could always back out of the arrangement as long as the airplane had not left. 9. Rate the level of success of the interaction Fully successful Total
failure
Fully successful, the airline and I both accomplished our goals. The airline had a volunteer to bump so that other customers could be accommodated. I had a day to spare and received a reimbursement. 10. Rate your satisfaction with the interaction Extremely satisfied Extremely Dissatisfied
Very satisfied. I felt very secure as I controlled to be a volunteer
or not. Also, the language of the airline staff was very polite and accommodating.
The event worked well for my situation as it was at the end of my vacation
and I could spare a day; in effect, my vacation was extended one day. Being
bumped at the start of the vacation is less preferable as it reduces the
time at the vacation destination.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| top
*
home * academics
dorian miller, 9/2/2003 |